Although zero trust architecture is frequently hailed as the cybersecurity of the future, can most organizations actually implement it?
Zero Trust: Is it Really Achievable?
- Thread starter precious
- Start date
I don't feel it's a matter of whether most organizations CAN actually implement Zero Trust - I believe it's more of a matter of whether they WILL BE assiduous in doing so!!!
Well said!....... Do you believe that the technical and resource requirements of achieving Zero Trust or corporate culture present a greater challenge?
I don't think an organization can fully and completely implement Zero Trust, particularly in a heterogenous environment. I think it's a goal for which organizations aspire, but never a truly attainable goal, IMAO.
/r
/r
What a fascinating viewpoint! I can understand how complete execution would be made more difficult in a diverse setting...Is it better to concentrate on particular areas where Zero Trust may be used more successfully, or should the objective be to come as close to it as possible?
As I mentioned in a previous post, it should really come down to whatever the organization has done through a risk assessment. It doesn't make sense to actually implement any kind of a security solution of any kind, until that occurs.
I believe it is.
It’s perfectly normal even entirely expected that there’s skepticism around ZTA, especially since it’s still a relatively new concept. In IT, change always comes with a side of uncertainty. Every new development invites an endless loop of "maybe," "if...else if," and "what if" scenarios. And then there is the inevitable financial and management hurdles.
However, ZTA isn’t just another passing fad. It’s backed by statutory requirements, meaning adoption isn’t optional. Regulatory pressures will mount, more organizations will inevitably find themselves onboard.
It’s not about if they’ll transition, but how they’ll execute it.
It’s perfectly normal even entirely expected that there’s skepticism around ZTA, especially since it’s still a relatively new concept. In IT, change always comes with a side of uncertainty. Every new development invites an endless loop of "maybe," "if...else if," and "what if" scenarios. And then there is the inevitable financial and management hurdles.
However, ZTA isn’t just another passing fad. It’s backed by statutory requirements, meaning adoption isn’t optional. Regulatory pressures will mount, more organizations will inevitably find themselves onboard.
It’s not about if they’ll transition, but how they’ll execute it.
Well, I think you said it all when you call it "Corporate Culture". In reality, that is what ZTA is. A culture. It's not just about protocols and configurations. It's a culture all by itself.
And so once organizations can begin to look at that as a cultural shift as opposed to a technical implementation, the road to success becomes clearer.
I meant in terms of difficulty-whether the technical complexity of implementing Zero Trust or the challenge of changing corporate culture and mindsets would be the bigger hurdle for organizations.
Indeed! Zero Trust is a mentality change rather than just technology........ It is far simpler to establish and maintain over time when organizations accept it as a cultural evolution rather than merely a set of regulations.
I don't see a challenge in changing corporate culture and mindsets. I don't believe anyone really wants to run an organization like a branch of the military. However, when there's a mission to be accomplished, orders MUST BE followed by EVERYONE!!!
Regarding implementation of Zero Trust, I see more of a financial hurdle than any technical complexity.
I make a motion to change the corporate culture and mindsets. All those in favor, say Aye!!!
Humans, for the most part, don't care much for change - old habits are hard to break. However,
when the mission is critical, sacrifices must be made!!!
The END!
Change is difficult, particularly when it comes to company customs and culture. But you're right-everyone needs to be on the same page when the purpose is important, and sometimes sacrifices are required. Regarding Zero Trust, while the financial component is a significant obstacle, the technical change can also be difficult, particularly when it comes to integration. However, if it helps accomplish the purpose and improves security, it's worth taking into account!
The last sentence in your response is the exclamation point for the entire comment!!!!!