No title

I'm looking forward to the DataX and CloudNetX. Rebranding CASP+ as SecurityX and ITF+ as Tech+ will cause unnecessary confusion.

I don't anticipate that I will pursue any of the CompTIA Essentials, CompTIA a+ series, or the CompTIA Pro series unless an employer or client mandates it.

CompTIA should've focused more on strengthening their brand for their current 14 certifications. Most job recruiters are unaware of CompTIA certs other than A+, Network+, and Security+.
 
very exciting news. much to expect this year. I think the new CompTIA Tech+ is a good move.
CompTIA announced Tech+ during Summit as part of them adapting certifications to more of a role-based model.

Rebranding CASP+ as SecurityX and ITF+ as Tech+ will cause unnecessary confusion.
I can't say I disagree with this. I think CompTIA was looking for some kind of marketing thought for the Expert series - maybe to get more awareness to it. As for ITF/Tech, perhaps Tech would be more of a "techie-level user", rather than someone who is in IT by job title or something. Remember when it was called 'Stratus'?

I don't anticipate that I will pursue any of the CompTIA Essentials, CompTIA a+ series, or the CompTIA Pro series unless an employer or client mandates it.
I suspect you shouldn't have to, given that those certs will update through the CE process anyway. Just keep taking your SecurityX until Judgment Day and you'll be okay.

CompTIA should've focused more on strengthening their brand for their current 14 certifications. Most job recruiters are unaware of CompTIA certs other than A+, Network+, and Security+.
Long time problem - and one that I actually approached Todd Thibodeaux during Summit. How do we fix the knowledge gap between job recruiters who don't really understand what the certs represent (i.e. trying to hire a Security+ certified or higher as entry level, etc etc). The thinking seems to be that if both are aiming at 'roles', then the certs and credentials will align with job requirements. Or that's the theory, anyway.
 
CompTIA announced Tech+ during Summit as part of them adapting certifications to more of a role-based model.

...

Long time problem - and one that I actually approached Todd Thibodeaux during Summit. How do we fix the knowledge gap between job recruiters who don't really understand what the certs represent (i.e. trying to hire a Security+ certified or higher as entry level, etc etc). The thinking seems to be that if both are aiming at 'roles', then the certs and credentials will align with job requirements. Or that's the theory, anyway.
Great point Rick!!!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rick Butler
I'm looking forward to the DataX and CloudNetX. Rebranding CASP+ as SecurityX and ITF+ as Tech+ will cause unnecessary confusion.

I don't anticipate that I will pursue any of the CompTIA Essentials, CompTIA a+ series, or the CompTIA Pro series unless an employer or client mandates it.

CompTIA should've focused more on strengthening their brand for their current 14 certifications. Most job recruiters are unaware of CompTIA certs other than A+, Network+, and Security+.
Great point Greg. People ask me why I focus on Sec+, CySA+, and CASP+. Why don't I pursue Network+ and Project+ since I worked in those areas in the past. I started curating my certifications back in 2020. Making sure that I can maintain the ones that are important to me and that I enjoy teaching.
 
Great point Greg. People ask me why I focus on Sec+, CySA+, and CASP+. Why don't I pursue Network+ and Project+ since I worked in those areas in the past. I started curating my certifications back in 2020. Making sure that I can maintain the ones that are important to me and that I enjoy teaching.
I've always been a fan of Network+ before Security+, as I believe there's just so much Security knowledge that's gleaned from having good understanding of how a computer network is supposed to function.

As for Project+ - well, my idiot self went to school to learn PM since I didn't know it at all and I wanted to be conversant with Project Managers as an IT practitioner. Instead, someone said, "hey, you have PM in your background" and moved me into a project management role. I knew I didn't want to be a project manager when I went, but I guess I got sucked into that maelstrom.

My professor of PM, Dr. Don Schley and I chatted over the holidays. He tells me about how so many things now are moving towards PM - things one would never realize. For example, in Medical, a Care PM uses Project Management theory to manage a holistic approach to care. Never occurred to me that would actually work, but sure-as-sugar, it makes crazy sense.

But PM is where more jobs are actually at. The trend I see is that organizations don't just want technical know-it-alls - they want people with a technical background who can steer production work. And that's the key. No one really cares that I am a CASP+ or whatever. What they care about is if I can keep our little school out of hot water with regulators by doing things that drive us to compliance - a thankless job to be sure, because no one cares about getting it right. They care about not getting it wrong.

I'm still one of these suckers that wants as many certs as I can get - perhaps it's comes from psychological need for validation that more certs means more respect...or some craziness like that. There's probably a psych paper in there somewhere - maybe the grounds for a doctoral thesis if I can convince anyone to fund a doctoral program.

Anyway... sorry if I sound a bit cynical - it's Monday.

/r