Andrew H said:

From a legal argument perspective, a "reasonable person" understands that coffee is hot without a warning label, but does that same "reasonable person" understand that what AI regurgitates is not thought or consciousness?

Click to expand...

Reasonable, to me, is one of these very subjective terms that seems to get pulled back and forth, based on monetary stake. Yes, there are weirdos out there who actually *like* cold coffee, but I'm at least smart enough to not jam a screwdriver in my eye and think it's Craftsman's fault if I do it anyway.

I submit this lighthearted point about...consequences...

Andrew H said:

so should there be safeguards in place to prevent them from accessing such systems? What about minors?

Click to expand...

Safeguards...and minors. I would as Meta about that - and one of the principal reasons why you'll NEVER see me on Facebook. Meanwhile, I could always pop that can of worms about Australia's ban on social media for kids below the age of 16.

Stephen Schneiter said:

I agree with Ricks commment asking where are the other family members throughout this experience.

Click to expand...

I remember back at a previous Partner Summit where CompTIA brought in Kara Swisher who railed on the big tech companies about child safety and all I could do between...shall we say...colorful metaphors grumbled quietly to myself...was, "where are the parents in this equation"? Yeah, big tech has a measure of culpability here, but there is a grand thing called parenting that seems to be missing, as kiddos find their way out to Club Penguin and Roblox, where all the creepers await.

jasoneckert said:

To do my part, I walk from classroom to classroom in the college and peer in the window with a stern and judgmental expression while holding this book: https://triosdevelopers.com/jason.eckert/stuff/ai_ethics.jpg

It seems to be working...

Click to expand...

Sorry man, but the only thing I can see is the "dome", buddy. I dare say, they are not seeing the title of the book...just...the...dome.

I think that trying to hold AI accountable for how people use it would be about as effective in practice as trying to quiet a room full of toddlers by whispering ‘shhh.’ Encouraging responsible use of AI through education is likely our best shot at avoiding tragedies.

To do my part, I walk from classroom to classroom in the college and peer in the window with a stern and judgmental expression while holding this book: https://triosdevelopers.com/jason.eckert/stuff/ai_ethics.jpg

It seems to be working...

Stephen,

I watched all of session 1 of AI essentials and did not receive my completion cert.

@Rick Butler and @Andrew H these are good points. I agree a "reasonable person" should not need a warning label about hot coffee. But we find ourselves in a society where we need warning labels for everything (that's a whole other topic).

It is an interesting time we find ourselves interacting with AI. I happened to catch a 60 Minutes story this past Sunday (it was on between football games) about kids interacting with Character AI, a chatbot platform that is currently at the center of a lawsuit where a family is stating that their daughter's interaction with the platform led her down a path where she finally committed suicide.

There have been similar conversations around other forms of social media platforms that can be used for good, and also negative ways, especially with younger audiences. I agree with Ricks commment asking where are the other family members throughout this experience.

I do feel that AI is a powerful tool, and we as instructors play a key role in helping folks understand what AI is and what it is not. We can help be that warning label for AI. Getting folks to understand that if we need to verify infomration AI provides us for school or work, why would we let AI make us feel bad about ourselves!

sirithanatharathorn said:

Today, I visited the CompTIA Store to purchase the Network+ Instructor Guide eBook, but I found that this product is no longer available in the store. I noticed a new product, CompTIA Network+ CertMaster Study, priced the same as the original eBook, and it’s the same for other courses as well. Can someone explain this to me? If I want the official slides for instructors, which are typically included in the Instructor Guide eBook, where can I purchase or access them now?

Click to expand...

I just looked at the instructor version of Network+ CertMaster Study. It does come with the powerpoint slides.

To download the slides, select the three dots next to the course title, then select "Resources".

Same in assessment.
I'm also unable to get the attendance certificate for Session 1. It's based on a standard 110 minute presentation for watch time, and the session wasn't long enough to achieve minimum watch time.

Rick Butler said:

Yeah, those that know me, know that I'm not the biggest fan of Skynet. There are definitely some things in the AI world that are making people defer to it, rather that traditional methods of getting help. However, to me, this seems much like blaming the screwdriver manufacturer for injury because the person stuck the tool in his eye, blaming the fork for obesity, and so forth.

There is a societal epidemic with regards to mental health. That much is so true these days. And while I don't want to get into a long dialogue about mental health, I would often wonder, where was the person's family - since now, they are seeking damages in what they are trying to make as a wrongful death suit. How concerned were they about their own family member who may have been exhibiting signs of paranoid delusion?

One might argue the topics of explainable vs. non-explainable models with respect to AI, but this article seemed to omit any details about Soelberg's (and family)'s responsibility in all this. Is there personal responsibility to be had with respect to human interaction with AI - or is this another example of the woman blaming McDonalds for burns to her lap from spilling hot coffee on it, just because the cup didn't say 'hot'?

Click to expand...

From a legal argument perspective, a "reasonable person" understands that coffee is hot without a warning label, but does that same "reasonable person" understand that what AI regurgitates is not thought or consciousness? Obviously in this instance, the person involved would not be considered rational in thought, so should there be safeguards in place to prevent them from accessing such systems? What about minors? All great and reasonable discussions I think. Glad I am just a lowly instructor and I don't need to answer any of the questions I ask!

Are you sure you're properly licensed for instructor access into the Linux+ Certmaster? As I understand it, there is no different product - it's based on your access key, so if you're a student, you see student stuff - instructor, instructor stuff.

Are you using the Certmaster offering that came from the recent TTT? I'm not sure if that was set up for student or instructor - haven't yet activated mine - been too focused on SecurityX renewal as well as regular work these days.

/r

I know, for me, as a staunch non-conformist and contrarian, I have often said, "I'm so done with Windoze - I'm going Linux". And there are points where I have tried to make that conversion, with the belief that there's nothing I can do with Windows that I cannot get done with Linux.

Except that's not entirely true. Or perhaps it is, but to get there requires an investment of time and energy that I simply don't have to replicate the same results in a Linux environment that I could quickly do with MSFT. MSFT has counted on this for decades as their way of holding onto control of the enterprise endpoint as well as various services out there. Pay them money and get things done quicker, versus having to slog through man pages and communities (or now, ask AI) to get things done.

Maybe this is one of those "Well, GIT GUD" things.

I do think everyone in the MSFT ecosystem can and should get better with Linux technology. And while Linux is predominantly running cloud workloads, even on Azure, not to mention Mariner being the underlying architecture for Azure Kubernetes, Windows isn't going away anytime soon.

Yeah, those that know me, know that I'm not the biggest fan of Skynet. There are definitely some things in the AI world that are making people defer to it, rather that traditional methods of getting help. However, to me, this seems much like blaming the screwdriver manufacturer for injury because the person stuck the tool in his eye, blaming the fork for obesity, and so forth.

There is a societal epidemic with regards to mental health. That much is so true these days. And while I don't want to get into a long dialogue about mental health, I would often wonder, where was the person's family - since now, they are seeking damages in what they are trying to make as a wrongful death suit. How concerned were they about their own family member who may have been exhibiting signs of paranoid delusion?

One might argue the topics of explainable vs. non-explainable models with respect to AI, but this article seemed to omit any details about Soelberg's (and family)'s responsibility in all this. Is there personal responsibility to be had with respect to human interaction with AI - or is this another example of the woman blaming McDonalds for burns to her lap from spilling hot coffee on it, just because the cup didn't say 'hot'?

Darryl Davis Esq. said:

Mitch,
Thanks for the inspiration! Your testimony and Jason Eckert's Linux TTT webinar series give me the courage to "go deeper" with Linux instruction...

Click to expand...

That’s awesome! Going deeper into Linux is the only rabbit hole where the rabbits wear penguin costumes and ask if you’ve tried editing the config file.

Jzol said:

@Stephen Schneiter and @Nicholas Pierce
Regarding the AI Essentials and AI Prompting Essentials courses, I do not see the option to take the assessment. Like Mr. Pierce, I am a professor and keep my CompTIA certification account separate from my CompTIA institution account. I would prefer to take the assessment on my personal account, as my full first and last name are on it, rather than on my institution account. I had to change this since the SSO was implemented. Under My Assessments, there is a Contact Support button, but I noticed it shows mailto:[email protected], which I’m not sure is an option or active.

Would you be able to help me with this so I can take the assessment? I’m not sure if others are having issues, mine for a fact is not showing

Also thank you because @Stephen Schneiter knows how popular he is I wanted to say thank you for all your hard work and patience especially when I'm taking the Linux CIN TTT courses and watched the videos, telling him I have the content and I promise I'll do it on my institution account. Spinal fusions are fun haha. I can't wait for the voucher and then I finally get my break soon! YAY!

Click to expand...

Same situation here.

Greeting Stephen
I did not receive my certificate yet.

My qubits can hardly wait.

Just caught up with the on-demand sessions, some great stuff in here

Registered here too ready to watch on demand

Are we able to watch today’s session if we can’t today, tomorrow?

I also had a general discussion question I thought of and would like to discuss further, I would love to hear perspectives and thoughts on my question. if the question comes up, I will be watching the recorded session tomorrow which hopefully is an option.

If two students in the same college class are involved in a situation where one unknowingly shares a malicious AI-generated reference, and the other clicks the link and receives a virus, does the affected student have grounds for legal action against the other? I assume the appropriate step is to notify the professor. If students are working from home, what procedures should be followed? I imagine the answer varies, but I thought I’d ask anyway: are people using a disclaimer that serves as enough, or are they thinking about moving forward with other measures, since AI can push out malicious links? As I replay the words, “trust but verify”, not all will follow this advice.

I love AI and still am learning a lot but having to teach and realize some people cannot use and ask Google questions is a challenge because now I have to form their minds. What do you all do for these kinds of moments and any thoughts on the above?

@Stephen Schneiter and @Nicholas Pierce
Regarding the AI Essentials and AI Prompting Essentials courses, I do not see the option to take the assessment. Like Mr. Pierce, I am a professor and keep my CompTIA certification account separate from my CompTIA institution account. I would prefer to take the assessment on my personal account, as my full first and last name are on it, rather than on my institution account. I had to change this since the SSO was implemented. Under My Assessments, there is a Contact Support button, but I noticed it shows mailto:[email protected], which I’m not sure is an option or active.

Would you be able to help me with this so I can take the assessment? I’m not sure if others are having issues, mine for a fact is not showing

Also thank you because @Stephen Schneiter knows how popular he is I wanted to say thank you for all your hard work and patience especially when I'm taking the Linux CIN TTT courses and watched the videos, telling him I have the content and I promise I'll do it on my institution account. Spinal fusions are fun haha. I can't wait for the voucher and then I finally get my break soon! YAY!

congrats Amelia

Congrats+

Hi Everyone! If you joined us live or viewed session 3, yesterday on-demand you heard that we will wrap this series up tomorrow with session 4! We will NOT meet on Monday, December 15th for session 5. Everything will be concluded tomorrow, December 10th.

Thanks for joining us with this series!

Yanjanani said:

that applies to me as well

Click to expand...

Should be in your inbox now.

Gregory Childers said:

Same problem here.

Click to expand...

Should be in your inbox now.

baylis said:

Same problem here !

Click to expand...

Should be in your inbox now.