LinkedIn Exam Scammers
- By BrianFord
- Certifications
- 2 Replies
S
You raised many important points, and I applaud you for offering great ideas to address this problem.
That said, these folks have been skulking around the Internet in various forums for as long as there has been an Internet.
Many of your ideas could be addressed by Pearson VUE. I've encountered everything you mentioned AND MORE. And I've reported these incidents to Pearson Vue. I can tell you that in some instances, when the fraud scheme is large, Pearson will act. This is a 'whack-a-mole' problem. Small operators that disappear before any action can be taken.
As an instructor, I try to educate everyone I work with that exam fraud is a crime, that it will cause reputational harm to those who engage these services, and that it will not benefit anyone but the perpetrators.
Brian
Shea,I have reported to LinkedIn almost 1000 times about scammers coming from India or the Philippines sending connect requests to myself and countless others in my network offering 100% guarantee's to pass exams. Here is the problem that really needs the CIN involvement from CompTIA because I see NO ONE talking about it on this side of the fence. LinkedIn is doing absolutely nothing and what is horrible and shameful is there is a bustling market and as hard as I work my butt off daily to study. I think EVERYONE should be required to take the exam HONESTLY. I know we have all of these written bylaws but criminals and their customers don't give a crap about rules.
1. Enable Geolocation exam scheduling. If a person's address is in Baltimore, Maryland or Philadelphia, PA. They should not be able to have a exam pass on their exam center from India, Shanghai, China or a foreign country outside of the US. The same is vice versa for someone sitting in Nairobi, Kenya with an exam center in Pakistan or India.
2. Focus on Practical questions in a higher density 80/20 versus multiple choice exams where brain dumps are common from unscrupulous vendors. I have reported even US based exam centers where I was asked if I wanted to pass some CompTIA or ISC2 exams. What was even more surprising is the same exam center was still open and I know they were doing this scam. I know it is a business and they have to be "caught", but if you see a ridiculous amount of exam passing in the same center. Their should be pattern verification and validation. This is not rocket science.
3. Cheaters will always find a way. I get it, but seriously. If we want employers and industry to take CompTIA exams dead serious. I would question why we don't make it more challenging for scammer companies or cheaters who profit off of the CompTIA name and exam brands.
4. Identify the exam center by name and location ON THE CERTIFICATION VALIDATION PORTAL. That is the #1 way to put a nail slammed shut on the scammer. If the exam center location is printed on the Certificate itself AND in the portal of the Certification validation portal. It literally shames people into taking their own dang exam and it disincentivizes the scammers whole business model of anonymity. CompTIA could lead the industry to doing such a simple change by adding a line to the certification exam with the location of the exam center where a person took the exam. Remote proctored exams should identify the city, state or country the exam was proctored.
5. "Login and take the exam for you" scams which has become the most common. Work with Pearson Vue to block all remote session ports during the exam and common remote software which will be a running process on the machine. If a person's machine flags. Require them to report to a local onsite exam center instead of just cancelling the exam.
Thoughts?
You raised many important points, and I applaud you for offering great ideas to address this problem.
That said, these folks have been skulking around the Internet in various forums for as long as there has been an Internet.
Many of your ideas could be addressed by Pearson VUE. I've encountered everything you mentioned AND MORE. And I've reported these incidents to Pearson Vue. I can tell you that in some instances, when the fraud scheme is large, Pearson will act. This is a 'whack-a-mole' problem. Small operators that disappear before any action can be taken.
As an instructor, I try to educate everyone I work with that exam fraud is a crime, that it will cause reputational harm to those who engage these services, and that it will not benefit anyone but the perpetrators.
Brian
