Linux+ study advice

I'll be taking the Linux+ XK0-006 exam this week. I have to admit that my Linux experience isn't on par with my Windows experience, but I do know a lot about hardware, software, scripting, security, networking, IAM, etc.

Do you have any advice that might help me prepare for the Linux+ exam? I have access to the CertMaster Learn, Labs, and Study materials. I also have access to the Instructor PDF and the slide decks for the class. Any sage advice, tips and tricks, "must-know" topics, or hints you can provide (without violating the NDA) would be greatly appreciated.
Jason Eckert has excellent books on Cengage.

Smh and Not sure where to go with this one

Introduce them to the concept of the Dunning-Kruger Effect and its implications for knowledge and expertise.

Prof. J
Ouch.
If he's already throwing his weight around, expertise he doesn't have, and threatening to sue, focus hard on the written, documented obligations. What EXACTLY were they promised in writing? Hopefully it was training and not a guaranteed pass.

Having the entire class review and sign an ethics statement and an acceptable use statement is very common organization policy grounding.
I have on the home page, and many, many, many places inside class exactly what the exam objectives are that we prepare for. There's a course entry quiz: I promise to read and abide by the Syllabus. There's a syllabus quiz with a variety of things like what are the assessed/graded items, when are they due, where do they find materials, and what's my email. Functionally if they refuse those, they cannot continue in class. They aren't willing to be a participant in the class. They still need to learn the material, fine, but not in this class. Class is a group thing, not an individual thing.
A pre-test and mentoring session about goal setting, and identifying their goals can be the equivalent on the mentoring side; are they willing to be a participant?
If they aren't willing to be a participant, what can be done with the sponsoring entity? Because if they are shoving into someplace he REALLY doesn't want to go, that's really on them.
An education foundation that I worked at had students, apprentices, and interns sign a contract. You do this. I do this. These are the obligations of participating. If you aren't willing to, then you don't participate. They also took mentoring seriously, and had policy framework in place. There was a weekly student form: Here's what I learned this week, Here's who I helped this week, Here's who helped me this week. The smallest part was what I did this week. If there was a mentoring meeting session it was put in a document: Here's what we discussed. You agreed to do this. I agreed to do that. The agreed upon deadline is this.
Some colleagues I know in other businesses and organizations started using a similar weekly check-in form after hearing about ours.
The critical key is it has to be organizational, not individual. Even if you didn't have it before now, before this class, once you start it will be applied everywhere, and there will be written documentation validating when/if you stop.

I've learned to break class into self-selected teams immediately. I also say you can be a team of one, but you probably don't want that. So far I've not had anyone who self-selected a team of one for the whole class (some weeks yes they did). You can rebalance and assign teams, but then you run the risk of perception and pushback. I've had success with suggesting rebalance, but other than occasionally splitting up a pair of students who chatted with each other and didn't focus on work I've rarely had to. However, if the teams self-select the problem out of their team... Back the students. If you have always said there can be a team of one, and that teams must cooperate, collaborate, and communicate internally, then that's setting and sticking to the framework.

When I was on remote help desk, the bigger the problem or more agitated the caller, the more I was "And I'm Kim. Here's what I'm hearing. Here's what WE will do first about it (involving them.) And I'm Kim." Immediate strong framework. Whatever happened, return it to the framework. As long as there was no personal attack "You *)(*&^)(^(!!!!!!" keep returning to the framework. The sun rises, here's the deal. We breathe air, here's the deal. There are no outside the framework discussion or options while dealing with them. Are there out of band that I juggle fast and hard to figure this out? Oh heck yeah!!! But when communicating with them, here's the framework. Anything else happens off to the side, and when we bring it back, here's the framework.

I hope this helps.
I really really really hope you don't get flambe.
It sounds like this is his mitigation for lack of skill and expertise. He can't throw those around, so he's trying to build and maintain reputation by alternate means.
Also on the don't assume malice if it might be stupidity, perhaps they were very strongly programmed that this is the path to success. It will take determined consistent modelling of what professionalism is, and regularly scheduled proactive mentor check-ins to shake and break this cycle. Bring in and discuss use cases from the news. Goodness knows there are alot of bad decisions that had consequences. Teach them to identify moments of choice, that they have and should use a voice, and start how to assess and make better choices.

CompTIA Instructors needed

Hi Everyone!

CompTIA Instructors needed​

Interested instructors, please send an email directly to [email protected] with cv, availability, expected hourly rate, and subject "CompTIA Instructor needed".

Thanks,

Nicolas Parodi
1787485869750.png

pentest and cysa4 and new linux I did send a mail through cv.

Linux+ study advice

I'll be taking the Linux+ XK0-006 exam this week. I have to admit that my Linux experience isn't on par with my Windows experience, but I do know a lot about hardware, software, scripting, security, networking, IAM, etc.

Do you have any advice that might help me prepare for the Linux+ exam? I have access to the CertMaster Learn, Labs, and Study materials. I also have access to the Instructor PDF and the slide decks for the class. Any sage advice, tips and tricks, "must-know" topics, or hints you can provide (without violating the NDA) would be greatly appreciated.
Cert-Master Learn follow objectives make sure you know the commands Ansible playbook yaml I have learned take objectives and make sure I understand linux concepts I did do linux many years ago but gave it a shot on cin that instructor covered quick a lot in the class. Like you windows Is first I know well. I passed it first time. Pbqs know your term things like gpt

Linux+ study advice

I'll be taking the Linux+ XK0-006 exam this week. I have to admit that my Linux experience isn't on par with my Windows experience, but I do know a lot about hardware, software, scripting, security, networking, IAM, etc.

Do you have any advice that might help me prepare for the Linux+ exam? I have access to the CertMaster Learn, Labs, and Study materials. I also have access to the Instructor PDF and the slide decks for the class. Any sage advice, tips and tricks, "must-know" topics, or hints you can provide (without violating the NDA) would be greatly appreciated.

Errors in SecAI+ Certmaster activity "Threat Model Analysis"

Just a quick note for anyone using or doing this specific activity, there are errors that I have reported that you should be aware of. For two of the scenarios I was given for the section 2.1.7 Activity: "Threat Model Analysis", the answers that I initially selected and should have been correct, were instead marked as incorrect. I had to select other options until I was able to get what it incorrectly thought was right before I could move to the next question. It clearly stated in the feedback for each that my initial answer was actually true, so there is a mismatch happening somewhere in the program. As it can take a bit of time for these things to get addressed, just consider that before blindly accepting the outputs are true.
If I might ask, when did you report that? What date? I had also reported a couple of issues, and I'm tracking how long it's taken for Dev to respond and make the changes.

Exam Voucher got Expired

I have developed an email filter specifically for managing these vouchers. While it’s possible I might overlook an email from the college president, I am confident I will never miss a voucher.

I typically schedule the exam for the latest possible date, but I remain flexible to move it earlier if needed. It’s officially marked on the calendar.

Prof. J

Smh and Not sure where to go with this one

Hi-

I am about to start our next A+ cohort. There's someone in there who took the 1101/1102 already back in 2024. In our bootcamps, we give the vouchers out with the classes and prep them hard to pass. This guy has some kind of degree in the field, and I think in his own country where he's from (I think it's India), he's worked in this field in some capacity. I have not started teaching yet, but I've seen some really weird, questionable conversations in the Teams chat- where he seems to present himself as an authority on all things IT, especially Security+ (he does not have anything other than A+ and he took a course on CCNA and got a certificate of completion). I feel like he's a bit prideful and will be a handful as well. And he does a lot of pushback with the organization who runs the bootcamp as well. He will be a firecracker!

Anyway, based on how he writes, the level of writing he has doesn't seem mature. But my bootcamp thinks that if he doesn't want to retake the 1201/1202, or do the CertMaster CE, perhaps he could do the industry experience (assuming he gets a job) or do this last part: Publish relevant articles, white papers, blog posts, or participate in recognized industry activities. I just don't see anyone who doesn't have writing experience being waved through to having their certification renewed. Is this pretty common? We are trying to decide which way to push him over the next couple of days. He's proven to be quite the arguer when presented with a situation he doesn't like or want to do!

Thanks!

DLRoss
Introduce them to the concept of the Dunning-Kruger Effect and its implications for knowledge and expertise.

Prof. J
  • Like
Reactions: Brandon G

IBM Z Educator Experience

To my fellow members of the CompTIA Instructor Network community,

If you're looking for ways to introduce enterprise computing, hybrid cloud, cybersecurity, and large-scale transaction processing concepts into your curriculum, this is an opportunity worth exploring.

The 𝗜𝗕𝗠 𝗭 𝗘𝗱𝘂𝗰𝗮𝘁𝗼𝗿 𝗘𝘅𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲 – 𝗖𝗼𝗵𝗼𝗿𝘁 𝟮 runs from 𝗦𝗲𝗽𝘁𝗲𝗺𝗯𝗲𝗿 𝟭𝟬 𝘁𝗼 𝗗𝗲𝗰𝗲𝗺𝗯𝗲𝗿 𝟭𝟴, 𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟲, and is designed to help educators bring IBM Z and mainframe technologies into the classroom.

What you'll get:
✅ 15-week structured learning program
✅ IBM Z and mainframe skills development
✅ Self-paced learning with expert-led sessions
✅ Classroom-ready teaching resources
✅ Recognition as an IBM Z Educator

Key dates:
📣 Applications Opened: June 15, 2026 (replay here: https://shorturl.at/WjIu9)
🔒 Applications Close: August 26, 2026
📚 Program Kickoff: September 10, 2026
🏁 Program Ends: December 18, 2026
🏆 Recognition Ceremony: January 7, 2027

As technology educators, we play an important role in preparing students for the skills that enterprises continue to rely on today. IBM Z remains a critical platform across banking, insurance, government, healthcare, and many of the world's largest organizations.

If you're interested in expanding your teaching portfolio and exposing students to enterprise computing, I encourage you to take a look.

𝗔𝗽𝗽𝗹𝘆 𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲: https://ibm.biz/ibmz-ee2026

1787340333671.png

Review My Flashcards?

Hello, fellow CINers!

Since we don't have a subforum for SecAI+ (and I don't believe we need one since SecAI+ is a Security 'expansion' certification), I wanted to post this here.

I've been a flashcard user and developer forever. I've always given my students pointers to flashcards I've developed. This past year I've soured on the web-based flashcard application that I had been paying for and using. After looking at several alternatives, I chose Brainscape. Why Brainscape and not something else? I've used Quizlet for years, but its flashcard capabilities haven't really changed. Instead, they seem to focus on other aspects of gamification and different audiences (school-age children and learner groups). The open-source solution is Anki, but I found it exposed a lot of capabilities, and it was hard for someone who just wanted to study with my decks to get started. I've also been using Kahoots, but it feels like they abandoned flashcards and went headfirst into gamification for groups of learners.

I've developed and now deploy flashcards in Brainscape, using their web interface as well as on Apple iOS and Android. It all works.

I've published my SecAI+ flashcards, and you can try them out by clicking here. I'd appreciate any feedback on these decks. Thanks!

Brian

Filter