• To ensure you get the most out of your CIN membership and stay connected with the latest updates, we are asking all members to update their community profiles. Please take a few moments to log in and: • Complete all sections of your profile • Review your current information for accuracy • Enter an alternative email address if desired (CIN requires your valid business email address for your training organization). Keeping your profile up to date helps us better serve you, ensures your account is correctly linked with CompTIA’s CRM, streamlines processes, enhances communication, and guarantees you never miss out on valuable CIN opportunities. Thank you for taking this important step! step!

Theory vs. Labs: Which One Do You Never Skip?

I just noticed how every trainer has a different ‘teaching style’ when delivering A+ or Network+. Some go deep into theory, others focus on troubleshooting labs. If you had to pick, what’s the one thing you never skip in your training sessions?
It is not skipping this or that. It is about customizing your delivery according to your audience.

CompTIA A+ 220-1201 (Core 1) and 220-1202 (Core 2) Exam Prep

From my experience, the TTT series is really useful, but it depends on your goal

If you’re preparing to take the A+ exam: TTT alone is not enough. You’ll definitely need extra resources like practice exams, CertMaster or additional resources to make sure you cover everything and get used to the exam style.

If your goal is to teach or train students: then the TTT series can actually be enough as a foundation, since it gives you the structure to explain concepts, but you should still explore extra materials to give your students richer examples.
Thank you @mohammfor you response.
Good point you mentioned here.
What material or site you used? Or you think it can help?.
What about time frame to prepare?

Theory vs. Labs: Which One Do You Never Skip?

I just noticed how every trainer has a different ‘teaching style’ when delivering A+ or Network+. Some go deep into theory, others focus on troubleshooting labs. If you had to pick, what’s the one thing you never skip in your training sessions?
For trainers that have experience delivering training over the years- its common knowledge that both theory and labs are important!

your balance for every batch or cohort will be dependent on the experience of the trainees

trainees with sufficient theoretical knowledge will need labs to complement and make them better and also I have seen persons in the field practicing for years but dont know the standards, jargons, principles and ethics or to put it lightly the how, why, when for different sceneries as they arise.

So bottom line - you cant skip any if you intend to benefit the participants

Passed the CompTIA A+ 220-1201 (Core 1) and 220-1202 (Core 2)

Please share the vouchers with others if you do not intend to use them this year.
@videsh31 Kindly note that vouchers cant be shared- they are name tied and have prerequisites which are clear( eg. mentoring or part of a training provider, participate in the live or on demand TTT sessions intended to help trainers deliver compTIA training or for CE etc.)

Vouchers normally have about 1yr duration so even if someone cant use it this year- next year upto June2026 is still an available timeline.

Thanks and awesome day ahead

CompTIA A+ 220-1201 (Core 1) and 220-1202 (Core 2) Exam Prep

From my experience, the TTT series is really useful, but it depends on your goal

If you’re preparing to take the A+ exam: TTT alone is not enough. You’ll definitely need extra resources like practice exams, CertMaster or additional resources to make sure you cover everything and get used to the exam style.

If your goal is to teach or train students: then the TTT series can actually be enough as a foundation, since it gives you the structure to explain concepts, but you should still explore extra materials to give your students richer examples.

Passed the CompTIA A+ 220-1201 (Core 1) and 220-1202 (Core 2)

Congrats! And yep, I've also got a couple of vouchers that need to be used before the end of the year. There are NOT enough hours in the day, lol.
I know that's right. I figure I have to find some quantum scientist out there that can add about 6-8 hours more to a day, just so I can get all my stuff done. Lately, I have to alternate my gym days with my cert study days. It's kinda a good system, but then something else jumps in to derail the training plan.

/r

CompTIA A+ 220-1201 (Core 1) and 220-1202 (Core 2) Exam Prep

Hi everyone,

Please share your experience for A+ Core1 and Core2 preparation.
Do you think attending TTT series alone is enough?
What materials/sites you used for prep?
How long you took to prepare?
Any specific tips?

Regards
When you ask about "A+ Core1 and Core2 preparation.", are you asking about preparation so that you can take the exam, or so that you can teach it?

Remember that the TTT was never designed to replace full instruction for a candidate who is wanting to take the exam for the first time. TTT was designed to give instructors materials, techniques, and ideas for delivering the content in their own learning environments. While our TTT instructors do a great job, there is the expectation that if you are in the TTT, you already have a good amount, if not all the skills you need to not only take, but teach the material.

/r

Passed the CompTIA A+ 220-1201 (Core 1) and 220-1202 (Core 2)

Hello CINers

- Spent about a week to prepare and write both exams after realizing I had quite some exams to trash out before the 2025 is gone.

- Used the CertMaster Perform study materials, slides to prepare

- Wrote both exams about 7 days apart

- Each exam starts with about 5 performance time-challenge questions(spent about 10mins each) and a lot of other tricky then moved on to much easier multi-choice questions.

Thanks

Linux+ v8 guide from Sybex: skips a whole objective

In the past, I've been the technical editor for all of the Linux- and UNIX-related titles at Wiley (at the request of other authors like Richard Blum and Christine Bresnahan since other Linux authors often provide for the most valuable technical reviews).

However, this year I haven't heard a peep that way, so I don't know what is happening at Wiley - but it's possible that cost-saving shortcuts are taking place (e.g., less content editing, consolidating authors).

What I can say is that if I were tech editing the the new title, I would have noted the absence of Objective 4.5, and recommended content for inclusion at certain places :)
Always good at what you do !
  • Like
Reactions: jasoneckert

Linux+ v8 guide from Sybex: skips a whole objective

G'day everyone!

I bought the Sybex Wiley study guide for Linux+ v8 (XK0-006), because that's the book my students will also be using.

I was looking forward to the authors' take on a few of the new objectives, most importantly 4.5 on the responsible use of AI and LLM.

The book's preface promises that objective 4.5 is discussed in a chapter, plus the header page for that same chapter says it's in there. But no. Absolutely zero mention of AI, LLM and related topics. It's not in the index, it's not in the table of contents, not a word is breathed about the whole objective 4.5

I've submitted an erratum form to Sybex Wiley, who have "forwarded it to second line"... but it's gone dead silent since then.

I also noticed that this new version of the book no longer has Christine Bresnahan on the cover; it's now only mr Blum. I wonder why.
In the past, I've been the technical editor for all of the Linux- and UNIX-related titles at Wiley (at the request of other authors like Richard Blum and Christine Bresnahan since other Linux authors often provide for the most valuable technical reviews).

However, this year I haven't heard a peep that way, so I don't know what is happening at Wiley - but it's possible that cost-saving shortcuts are taking place (e.g., less content editing, consolidating authors).

What I can say is that if I were tech editing the the new title, I would have noted the absence of Objective 4.5, and recommended content for inclusion at certain places :)

CompTIA quiz lockout features

I'm not sure if it really matters because if a student wanted to look up answers, they could just open up another tab to anywhere on the net - and with AI-this and Skynet-that, well, they might actually have better luck with asking ChatGPT.

It might be better to just use the quizzes as a learning aid and go with, "well, if they elect to cheat, then they're not doing themselves any favors".

/r

Filter