CompTIA Restructure
- By jasoneckert
- CIN Open Forums
- 24 Replies
I'm just going to go ahead and ask the question I'm sure we're all thinking: After the acquisition, will the + symbol be changed?
Oh I don't mean that it's too much for a 5-day class (which it is too!!).Isn`t that happening with other Courses as well? A+ or the new Cloud+?
The SME pack way to much in 5 days so, we just scratch the surface instead cover it more in Detail (f.e. something like the Boot Process from power On till Log On Screen).
Oh good! It's not just me, then.The additions from 005->006 seemed bizarre, while the additions we had moving from 004->005 made excellent sense.
There is no link.Please send me the Link for the registration
Best regards
Please send me the Link for the registrationCompTIA opened the XK1-006 beta exams today. I'm signed up and I'm taking it tomorrow.
As is tradition, I've done my comparison of 005 vs 006 -> https://www.kilala.nl/index.php?id=2609
In short, I'm not a fan of 006.
The changes from 004 to 005 looked pretty good at the time! But now 006 feels messy, it feels like it's trying to do too much and I feel it has lost its focus.
Isn`t that happening with other Courses as well? A+ or the new Cloud+?CompTIA opened the XK1-006 beta exams today. I'm signed up and I'm taking it tomorrow.
As is tradition, I've done my comparison of 005 vs 006 -> https://www.kilala.nl/index.php?id=2609
In short, I'm not a fan of 006.
The changes from 004 to 005 looked pretty good at the time! But now 006 feels messy, it feels like it's trying to do too much and I feel it has lost its focus.
The structure is still going to be the same because the book is designed to teach Linux key concepts in a logical way. But since my book targets both Linux+ and LPIC-1 (a leftover from when Linux+ was "Powered by LPI"), I'm hoping to just target Linux+ for this next edition. This would allow me to remove some of the unuseful/distracting legacy material that LPIC-1 still has to make way for some of the new material, such as AI (or what I like to call "Grand Theft Autocorrect" ).I'm very curious to see which changes you've made to your book!
Interesting - while I haven't written the exam yet, when I went through the detailed exam objectives in preparation for the 7th edition of my book, I got the exact same impression. The additions from 005->006 seemed bizarre, while the additions we had moving from 004->005 made excellent sense.CompTIA opened the XK1-006 beta exams today. I'm signed up and I'm taking it tomorrow.
As is tradition, I've done my comparison of 005 vs 006 -> https://www.kilala.nl/index.php?id=2609
In short, I'm not a fan of 006.
The changes from 004 to 005 looked pretty good at the time! But now 006 feels messy, it feels like it's trying to do too much and I feel it has lost its focus.
I'm very curious to see which changes you've made to your book!I've just kicked off the 7th edition of my Cengage textbook for it so that it coincides with launch
This news gave me shivers...In other somewhat related devastating news: ITPro.tv / ACI has laid off all their video training content creators.
Kathy Chambers on LinkedIn: I could not decide if I wanted to keep this professional, or call out my… | 123 comments
I could not decide if I wanted to keep this professional, or call out my former company for royally sucking and laying off a group of super talented people… | 123 comments on LinkedInwww.linkedin.com
Wow. Those were quality people. I actually worked with ITProTV in creating video content for the CyberPatriot program, back in 2016, as part of a grant I managed. Spent a week in Gainsville at their location and enjoyed the experience.In other somewhat related devastating news: ITPro.tv / ACI has laid off all their video training content creators.
Kathy Chambers on LinkedIn: I could not decide if I wanted to keep this professional, or call out my… | 123 comments
I could not decide if I wanted to keep this professional, or call out my former company for royally sucking and laying off a group of super talented people… | 123 comments on LinkedInwww.linkedin.com
Not a response, just a general statement.Yes, that is exactly what's happening. What previous post was this in response to?
Yes, that is exactly what's happening. What previous post was this in response to?It is my understanding that the training and certification portion of CompTIA was part of the acquisition and that it will be run as a for-profit entity.
Please copy me the material for reference seek.I used to use capstone projects for my Network+ classes back in the day - one of which involved setting up a campus network for a multi-building layout.
For security+, I used to have small hacking challenges that would lead to students being able to take their final with the answer key - if they could bust through the challenges.
I'll have to look around and see if I still have this material - it was some time ago and it may be dated.
You just did.Many thanks Emmauel for your reply!!!
Mr. Rick Butler, I'm going to report you to the CIN community authorities!!!! Ah, I'm not sure who to contact. Can I get your assistance on this, please
Step 1 I understand, they need money, especially after buying TestOut etc. Step 2 is lovely and while they don't mention the lobbying they do, I guess that's also in there somewhere.
Step 3 is what confuses me, because [,...] the non-profit gets money for the brand, which they will then use to promote the brand... which they've sold?
while its existing membership-based, 501(c)(6) nonprofit organization will be separated from CompTIA, will be given a new name and will operate as a separate entity. For now, it's referred to as 'the association,' Thibodeaux said.